GH15

Advanced search  
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10
 1 
 on: Today at 02:00:11 AM 
Started by vansville2010 - Last post by POWERSHARK
Black power bitches your just intimidated by my divine wisdom and thick black cock.

 2 
 on: Today at 01:04:38 AM 
Started by Bose88 - Last post by Paso85
Arabs and Persians fought many wars. Arabs are superior warrior race.

excellent.

i like when people are precise.
You are very welcome.

 3 
 on: Today at 12:39:16 AM 
Started by Bose88 - Last post by Bose88
Arabs and Persians fought many wars. Arabs are superior warrior race.

excellent.

i like when people are precise.

 4 
 on: Today at 12:31:48 AM 
Started by vansville2010 - Last post by Bose88
powershark is a (really) fat mexican.

 5 
 on: Today at 12:05:11 AM 
Started by vansville2010 - Last post by kohl
Of course it is biased. If you measure success in the western society, you have to measure westerners only. Not others. Even if those others came voluntarily there, WILL NOT perform equally since they did not created the civilizations. Therefore, IT IS biased. In order to have a neutral measurement, you will have to create a complete different structure of measuring intelligence in a specific race in its own specific habitat. Without influence of "your" civilization.

Otherwise is just like measuring the swimming skills of a fish compared to a dog. Of course the dog will always perform horrible compared to the fish, just like if you try to measure the ability of the fish running behind its pray. Its ridiculous. ou have to measure the dog and the fish independently in their own habitats and nature.

In fact, I wrote a paper some decades ago when I analyzed the reality of third world countries. I came to the conclusion that the mediocrity and instability of all those countries has its roots in the radical implant of concepts and technology not invented by them. If you saw the old movie "the Gods must be crazy", thats exactly the phenomenon that occurs. But that doesnt necessarily mean that those societies are less intelligent or "inferior" like some lunatics try to make it seem. Perhaps if you take away all technogym and western concepts and let them organize in Tribes with nature, they will live perfectly fine, successful, peacefully.

We can see this same phenomenon in a compressed amount of time when we go to "liberate" a country. We remove their leader, we impose "democracy", dump billions if not trillions of dollars on them to build the new democratic nation, goes what. They perform worse than before. Why? Because you're imposing a civilization that is not for them. It doest belong to them. Therefore you cannot measure them by the same parameters.


So you analyzed the reality in third world countries? Great! Did you also go there? Or did you make your analysis from the Global behind your pc?



P.S. I completely agree with your plan to give Africa back to the blacks and completely withdraw. (question is: what to do with all the blacks who are in Europe and the Global and who are undadpted to modern society? Do we send them to Africa and close the door?)

Result will be that in 5 years there will be no electricity anymore in Africa and in 50 years population will have gone down from 2 billion to 100 million (original population number for thoGlobalnds of years, before whites arrived).

One difficulty is that it's not only the whites who are in Africa now. Africa today is getting colonized by the chinese in all silence, and I'm sure they don't want to leave.

Other difficulty is that I think 99% of the Africans will not be happy to live without the western comfort and technology.

I lived in the third world for many years, bonded with the people, interacted with the people, I had to use logic and reason to interpret and give an explanation to mediocrity. In third world countries you park your car outside. Over night somebody steal the emblem of your car like the "Ford" emblem for example. Security and law enforcement is mediocre. Nobody se anything, nobody does anything. The owner goes on sunday to the flea market that is laid out on the side walk of a busy avenue, find his emblem used and buy it used. Next weekend, his emblem is stolen again. Owner repeats the process. There are 50% chances the one he is constantly being is He's. No way to prove it, no legal resource for him to do anything. That is a tiny detail of their societies. A tiny fraction of the whole system and culture they live with every day.


As far as what to do with unadapted Africans? Solution is capitalism. That comfortability comes from corrupt governments (chosen by its people) who create and extend social programs, open borders, asylum laws, they incentive this debacle. What would be the solution in an ideal world? Bring those blacks up to modern standard through education. They will receive all the training and education necessary and the capitalist system will create work opportunities for everybody equally. At the same time a real capitalist system will severely cut social benefits and programs forbidding them to live from the government or ending for them the possibility of doing nothing. Work, ingenuity, will be the solution. A tough law enforcement keeps crime down and an efficient legal system is relentless against crime of all kind. Thats how you create a stable society. No room for a group being dragged by a majority. That group is created only when you differentiate by race and treat them differently. In this case historically, as a minority with special benefits. The solution is to stop seeing color, treat everybody equally, after bringing those behind up through education fo course. Once everybody is up to par, everybody has access to everything equally, social classes and standard of living will be separated strictly by IQ. Natural selection. BUT NOT because somebody is rounding up a group and keeping them there.


"bringing those behind up through education"

That will work with 1 out of 6 blacks. All others simply lack the ability to learn. You can not bring an IQ up by 10 points. No education can do that.

And then we're not even talking about the collective memory. Read Jung. After having lived for years in Africa, I sincerely believe that certain archetypes are locked in our DNA.

Of course I'm not saying that all blacks or all arabs are the same. But certain characteristics are in the DNA. When you see an exception, then it is most probably a mutation. For example: most blacks are lazy and unpunctual. That is because in their evolution they never learned (needed) to structure their life. Arabs on the other hand are aggressive. (Why that is I don't know, but it's a fact. Try an arab woman! You will understand why those are beaten up by their arab husbands.) There are exceptions, but those exceptions only confirm the rule. There is nothing "racist" about saying that certain groups have certain characteristics. Youngsters are reckless, elders are more prudent. Women are emotional, men are rational. Those are all generalizations that are based on truth, but it doesn't mean that an individual cannot differ from the general rule.
Are you fucking stupid? DID you Google that? Are you God mother fucker? How can you make such precise assumptions living in your mom's house? Have you traveled the world? Do you know more than 10 blacks? Your fucking stupid. All you guys are retarded talking like you guys know people and life.


Listen retard: yes I traveled the world and I know more Africans then you have ever met in your miserable life. You black Americans are the dumbest blacks in the whole world. At least African blacks are humble and know where they come from. American blacks have completely lost every sense of reality. You look at African Voices on CNN and bullshit movies like Black Panther in which they suggest blacks are superheroes. Truth is, that blacks when you allow them to organize their own community, end up in ghetto's or in a hellhole country like Haiti. That is exactly where you belong. Now get off that white pc and get back to your own level of communication: a tamtam.

 6 
 on: January 22, 2019, 06:33:41 PM 
Started by gh15 - Last post by klover15
I'm in the market to buy a van to live out of for when the world goes to shit. the more i read about 5G the more i'm convinced that it's going to play a major role in the world self destructing in the near future.

I read somewhere that elon musk is someone pushing for 5G. I figured he would be a little smarter than trying to push something like this out so soon?

 7 
 on: January 22, 2019, 05:49:35 PM 
Started by Bose88 - Last post by POWERSHARK
Persian people are bitches.... how do I know that? I watched 300

 8 
 on: January 22, 2019, 05:47:38 PM 
Started by vansville2010 - Last post by POWERSHARK
Of course it is biased. If you measure success in the western society, you have to measure westerners only. Not others. Even if those others came voluntarily there, WILL NOT perform equally since they did not created the civilizations. Therefore, IT IS biased. In order to have a neutral measurement, you will have to create a complete different structure of measuring intelligence in a specific race in its own specific habitat. Without influence of "your" civilization.

Otherwise is just like measuring the swimming skills of a fish compared to a dog. Of course the dog will always perform horrible compared to the fish, just like if you try to measure the ability of the fish running behind its pray. Its ridiculous. ou have to measure the dog and the fish independently in their own habitats and nature.

In fact, I wrote a paper some decades ago when I analyzed the reality of third world countries. I came to the conclusion that the mediocrity and instability of all those countries has its roots in the radical implant of concepts and technology not invented by them. If you saw the old movie "the Gods must be crazy", thats exactly the phenomenon that occurs. But that doesnt necessarily mean that those societies are less intelligent or "inferior" like some lunatics try to make it seem. Perhaps if you take away all technogym and western concepts and let them organize in Tribes with nature, they will live perfectly fine, successful, peacefully.

We can see this same phenomenon in a compressed amount of time when we go to "liberate" a country. We remove their leader, we impose "democracy", dump billions if not trillions of dollars on them to build the new democratic nation, goes what. They perform worse than before. Why? Because you're imposing a civilization that is not for them. It doest belong to them. Therefore you cannot measure them by the same parameters.


So you analyzed the reality in third world countries? Great! Did you also go there? Or did you make your analysis from the Global behind your pc?



P.S. I completely agree with your plan to give Africa back to the blacks and completely withdraw. (question is: what to do with all the blacks who are in Europe and the Global and who are undadpted to modern society? Do we send them to Africa and close the door?)

Result will be that in 5 years there will be no electricity anymore in Africa and in 50 years population will have gone down from 2 billion to 100 million (original population number for thoGlobalnds of years, before whites arrived).

One difficulty is that it's not only the whites who are in Africa now. Africa today is getting colonized by the chinese in all silence, and I'm sure they don't want to leave.

Other difficulty is that I think 99% of the Africans will not be happy to live without the western comfort and technology.

I lived in the third world for many years, bonded with the people, interacted with the people, I had to use logic and reason to interpret and give an explanation to mediocrity. In third world countries you park your car outside. Over night somebody steal the emblem of your car like the "Ford" emblem for example. Security and law enforcement is mediocre. Nobody se anything, nobody does anything. The owner goes on sunday to the flea market that is laid out on the side walk of a busy avenue, find his emblem used and buy it used. Next weekend, his emblem is stolen again. Owner repeats the process. There are 50% chances the one he is constantly being is He's. No way to prove it, no legal resource for him to do anything. That is a tiny detail of their societies. A tiny fraction of the whole system and culture they live with every day.


As far as what to do with unadapted Africans? Solution is capitalism. That comfortability comes from corrupt governments (chosen by its people) who create and extend social programs, open borders, asylum laws, they incentive this debacle. What would be the solution in an ideal world? Bring those blacks up to modern standard through education. They will receive all the training and education necessary and the capitalist system will create work opportunities for everybody equally. At the same time a real capitalist system will severely cut social benefits and programs forbidding them to live from the government or ending for them the possibility of doing nothing. Work, ingenuity, will be the solution. A tough law enforcement keeps crime down and an efficient legal system is relentless against crime of all kind. Thats how you create a stable society. No room for a group being dragged by a majority. That group is created only when you differentiate by race and treat them differently. In this case historically, as a minority with special benefits. The solution is to stop seeing color, treat everybody equally, after bringing those behind up through education fo course. Once everybody is up to par, everybody has access to everything equally, social classes and standard of living will be separated strictly by IQ. Natural selection. BUT NOT because somebody is rounding up a group and keeping them there.


"bringing those behind up through education"

That will work with 1 out of 6 blacks. All others simply lack the ability to learn. You can not bring an IQ up by 10 points. No education can do that.

And then we're not even talking about the collective memory. Read Jung. After having lived for years in Africa, I sincerely believe that certain archetypes are locked in our DNA.

Of course I'm not saying that all blacks or all arabs are the same. But certain characteristics are in the DNA. When you see an exception, then it is most probably a mutation. For example: most blacks are lazy and unpunctual. That is because in their evolution they never learned (needed) to structure their life. Arabs on the other hand are aggressive. (Why that is I don't know, but it's a fact. Try an arab woman! You will understand why those are beaten up by their arab husbands.) There are exceptions, but those exceptions only confirm the rule. There is nothing "racist" about saying that certain groups have certain characteristics. Youngsters are reckless, elders are more prudent. Women are emotional, men are rational. Those are all generalizations that are based on truth, but it doesn't mean that an individual cannot differ from the general rule.
Are you fucking stupid? DID you Google that? Are you God mother fucker? How can you make such precise assumptions living in your mom's house? Have you traveled the world? Do you know more than 10 blacks? Your fucking stupid. All you guys are retarded talking like you guys know people and life.

 9 
 on: January 22, 2019, 05:11:46 PM 
Started by Bose88 - Last post by Paso85
Arabs and Persians fought many wars. Arabs are superior warrior race. They defeated Persians and invaded the land of Persia and spread Islam among Zoroastrian Persians. Those who refused to convert fled to India (& Pakistan). They turned you into Muslims....


That's after greeks did the same to you lot way before.

Nowadays, Persians buy white convertible BMW's, peel off 318 badges and stick on M3  ;)

You all pretend you Italian, just like the kurds lol and what on earth have you done to your own country with the revolution in 70's is just mind blowing.

 10 
 on: January 22, 2019, 04:40:09 PM 
Started by vansville2010 - Last post by kohl
Of course it is biased. If you measure success in the western society, you have to measure westerners only. Not others. Even if those others came voluntarily there, WILL NOT perform equally since they did not created the civilizations. Therefore, IT IS biased. In order to have a neutral measurement, you will have to create a complete different structure of measuring intelligence in a specific race in its own specific habitat. Without influence of "your" civilization.

Otherwise is just like measuring the swimming skills of a fish compared to a dog. Of course the dog will always perform horrible compared to the fish, just like if you try to measure the ability of the fish running behind its pray. Its ridiculous. ou have to measure the dog and the fish independently in their own habitats and nature.

In fact, I wrote a paper some decades ago when I analyzed the reality of third world countries. I came to the conclusion that the mediocrity and instability of all those countries has its roots in the radical implant of concepts and technology not invented by them. If you saw the old movie "the Gods must be crazy", thats exactly the phenomenon that occurs. But that doesnt necessarily mean that those societies are less intelligent or "inferior" like some lunatics try to make it seem. Perhaps if you take away all technogym and western concepts and let them organize in Tribes with nature, they will live perfectly fine, successful, peacefully.

We can see this same phenomenon in a compressed amount of time when we go to "liberate" a country. We remove their leader, we impose "democracy", dump billions if not trillions of dollars on them to build the new democratic nation, goes what. They perform worse than before. Why? Because you're imposing a civilization that is not for them. It doest belong to them. Therefore you cannot measure them by the same parameters.


So you analyzed the reality in third world countries? Great! Did you also go there? Or did you make your analysis from the Global behind your pc?



P.S. I completely agree with your plan to give Africa back to the blacks and completely withdraw. (question is: what to do with all the blacks who are in Europe and the Global and who are undadpted to modern society? Do we send them to Africa and close the door?)

Result will be that in 5 years there will be no electricity anymore in Africa and in 50 years population will have gone down from 2 billion to 100 million (original population number for thoGlobalnds of years, before whites arrived).

One difficulty is that it's not only the whites who are in Africa now. Africa today is getting colonized by the chinese in all silence, and I'm sure they don't want to leave.

Other difficulty is that I think 99% of the Africans will not be happy to live without the western comfort and technology.

I lived in the third world for many years, bonded with the people, interacted with the people, I had to use logic and reason to interpret and give an explanation to mediocrity. In third world countries you park your car outside. Over night somebody steal the emblem of your car like the "Ford" emblem for example. Security and law enforcement is mediocre. Nobody se anything, nobody does anything. The owner goes on sunday to the flea market that is laid out on the side walk of a busy avenue, find his emblem used and buy it used. Next weekend, his emblem is stolen again. Owner repeats the process. There are 50% chances the one he is constantly being is He's. No way to prove it, no legal resource for him to do anything. That is a tiny detail of their societies. A tiny fraction of the whole system and culture they live with every day.


As far as what to do with unadapted Africans? Solution is capitalism. That comfortability comes from corrupt governments (chosen by its people) who create and extend social programs, open borders, asylum laws, they incentive this debacle. What would be the solution in an ideal world? Bring those blacks up to modern standard through education. They will receive all the training and education necessary and the capitalist system will create work opportunities for everybody equally. At the same time a real capitalist system will severely cut social benefits and programs forbidding them to live from the government or ending for them the possibility of doing nothing. Work, ingenuity, will be the solution. A tough law enforcement keeps crime down and an efficient legal system is relentless against crime of all kind. Thats how you create a stable society. No room for a group being dragged by a majority. That group is created only when you differentiate by race and treat them differently. In this case historically, as a minority with special benefits. The solution is to stop seeing color, treat everybody equally, after bringing those behind up through education fo course. Once everybody is up to par, everybody has access to everything equally, social classes and standard of living will be separated strictly by IQ. Natural selection. BUT NOT because somebody is rounding up a group and keeping them there.


"bringing those behind up through education"

That will work with 1 out of 6 blacks. All others simply lack the ability to learn. You can not bring an IQ up by 10 points. No education can do that.

And then we're not even talking about the collective memory. Read Jung. After having lived for years in Africa, I sincerely believe that certain archetypes are locked in our DNA.

Of course I'm not saying that all blacks or all arabs are the same. But certain characteristics are in the DNA. When you see an exception, then it is most probably a mutation. For example: most blacks are lazy and unpunctual. That is because in their evolution they never learned (needed) to structure their life. Arabs on the other hand are aggressive. (Why that is I don't know, but it's a fact. Try an arab woman! You will understand why those are beaten up by their arab husbands.) There are exceptions, but those exceptions only confirm the rule. There is nothing "racist" about saying that certain groups have certain characteristics. Youngsters are reckless, elders are more prudent. Women are emotional, men are rational. Those are all generalizations that are based on truth, but it doesn't mean that an individual cannot differ from the general rule.


Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 10